News14 Sept 20268 min read

BESS supplier bankability: CATL to AAA, Wärtsilä to BB

Antony Topunov, Co-founder, SOLTECHAntony TopunovCo-founder, SOLTECH
BESS supplier bankability: CATL upgraded to AAA and Wärtsilä downgraded to BB in the Q2 2026 Battery StorageTech ratings

Solar Media's Q2 bankability update lifts CATL to AAA and cuts Wärtsilä to BB. The top five BESS suppliers hold about 39% of shipments. What it means.

BESS supplier bankability has been reshuffled. In its Q2 2026 update, published on 9 September, Solar Media Market Research upgraded CATL to AAA on the strength of its energy storage revenue growth and downgraded Wärtsilä from BBB to BB on persistently low storage orders. The scale runs from AAA to C and measures company risk, not product performance.

What changed in the Q2 2026 ratings

ItemDetailSource
ReportBattery StorageTech Bankability Ratings Report, Q2 update, published 9 September 2026Energy-Storage.News
UpgradeCATL raised to AAA on energy storage revenue growthEnergy-Storage.News
DowngradeWärtsilä cut from BBB to BBEnergy-Storage.News
Reason for downgradeContinuously low ESS orders; ESS business spun into a JV with RCT Solutions, expected loss-making in 2026Energy-Storage.News
Methodology changeGreater weight on owning battery cell production, after lithium carbonate prices rose in Q2 2026Energy-Storage.News
Other moversProfit increases at Rept Battero, CALB and EVE EnergyEnergy-Storage.News
Fluence backlogAll-time high of US$5.6 billionEnergy-Storage.News
Market concentrationTop five suppliers hold about 39% of shipments, against 40% in 2025Energy-Storage.News
Chinese overseas revenueUp an average of 51% in H1 2026, and up 3 percentage points as a share of total revenueEnergy-Storage.News
New Chinese capacityOver RMB 120 billion of new battery manufacturing projects publicly announced in H1 2026Energy-Storage.News

Cell prices reversed, and the ratings followed

The single change driving this update is that battery costs stopped going down. Lithium carbonate prices climbed in the second quarter of 2026 and LFP cell prices followed, reversing the steady decline of the preceding years. That turned vertical integration from a nice-to-have into a balance-sheet advantage: a supplier that makes its own cells absorbs the input cost swing, while a pure integrator has to pass it on or eat it.

The pressure is compounding from a second direction. Chinese cell makers began raising list prices from 1 September 2026, when a 2% consumption tax on lithium-ion batteries took effect - CATL, for one, lifted its 314Ah storage cell from RMB 0.414/Wh to RMB 0.423/Wh. Anyone still budgeting a battery on 2024 or 2025 price curves is working from a stale number.

Where the growth is going

Chinese suppliers are pushing outward. Overseas revenue rose an average of 51% in the first half of 2026 and gained three percentage points as a share of total revenue, as domestic margin pressure made export markets more attractive. RelyEZ is a clean illustration: over 95% of its 2024 and 2025 shipment volume went to domestic sites, and in 2026 it delivered into Poland and Hungary.

The new demand is arriving in places that were not on the map two years ago. Romania approved a EUR 150 million (US$174 million) support scheme, Bulgaria's RESTORE programme backs more than 4 GWh of battery storage projects, Argentina has been running storage tenders since 2025 and Brazil holds its first battery storage auction this year. India commissioned its largest BESS to date, at 3.37 GWh, and has proposed mandatory co-location for new solar and wind.

At the top the market is not fragmenting. The combined share of the five largest suppliers was around 39%, barely moved from 40% a year earlier, while the mid-tier stays crowded and price-driven. Meanwhile more than RMB 120 billion of new Chinese battery manufacturing projects were announced in the first half of 2026 alone - capacity being added into a market that is already competing hard on margin.

The SOLTECH view

Storage is no longer an optional line in Gulf procurement. Abu Dhabi's round-the-clock project pairs 5.2 GW of solar with 19 GWh of batteries, Saudi Arabia has signed 8 GWh of storage contracts, and rooftop-scale storage is starting to appear in C&I tenders. That makes supplier selection a fifteen-to-twenty-year credit decision, and this report is a useful input to it. It is also frequently misused, so three cautions.

For a villa owner in the UAE: none of this argues for buying a home battery yet. Under Shams Dubai net metering the grid already acts as your store at no capital cost, and we have written before about how DEWA tariffs shape that maths. A battery earns its place when you have genuine outage exposure, a load profile the grid cannot absorb, or an off-grid site - not because the storage market is booming. If someone quotes you one anyway, ask which entity signs the performance guarantee and what happens to it if that entity is sold.

For EPC contractors: the useful discipline is separating the cell rating from the integrator rating. A AAA cell maker inside a container assembled and warranted by a thinly capitalised integrator gives you a AAA sticker and an unrated obligation. Get cell-level traceability, the integrator's own financials, and a warranty that names a legal entity you could actually pursue. The Wärtsilä downgrade is the case in point: the corporate parent is large and solvent, and the ESS obligations have been moved into a joint venture expected to lose money this year.

For investors: we would not lean on a single ratings agency, and we say that about this report as much as any other. It is a model with disclosed inputs - financial health, manufacturing, shipments - and its Q2 methodology change explicitly rewarded companies that own cell plants, which mechanically favours CATL and its Chinese peers. That may well be the right call given where input costs went. It is still a judgement, not a measurement. Read it alongside the supplier's own filings and your own site data before it sets your procurement shortlist. Our approach to underwriting is set out on the investor page, and our equipment position on products.

Related reading: China's battery consumption tax and rising cell prices, Saudi Arabia's first 2 GW / 8 GWh storage deals, and storage for commercial and industrial sites.

Sources

SOLTECH Solar Wiki · General information, not a design document. System-specific numbers always come from a site assessment. ← All articles

Discussion

No comments yet — yours would be the first.

Leave a comment

Comments are read before they appear. Disagreement is welcome; advertising is not.

Ask Antony a question

A question about your own roof, bill or project. The answer is published under this article and a copy goes to your email.

More in News

Enerparc insolvency hits Europe's 5.5 GW solar ownerHamburg's district court opened preliminary insolvency proceedings for Enerparc AG on 7 September 2026, a 5.5 GW solar owner that raised €1bn in spring. US installs 19.2 GW of solar in the first half of 2026SEIA and Wood Mackenzie report 19.2 GW of US solar in H1 2026 and 11.4 GW in Q2 alone, with utility-scale up 61% and residential down 12% year on year. Gulf solar imports fall up to 90% on Hormuz disruptionRystad data shows UAE solar equipment imports fell to about 100 MW a month from March to June 2026, down nearly 90% on the 785 MW monthly average of 2025.
Contact us

Reach out — we reply within one business day

For savings proposals, site assessments, equipment quotes or partnership enquiries — send a message and a SOLTECH consultant will come back to you.

hello@soltech.solutions
  • All enquiries are actively monitored
  • Free site assessment, proposal in 24–48 h
  • Mon–Sat, 9:00–19:00 GST · Dubai, UAE

Please enter your phone number.

We work with sites from 10,000 kWh a month, about AED 3,969 on the bill.

By submitting this form you agree to be contacted by SOLTECH regarding your enquiry. See our Privacy Policy for what we collect and how to have it deleted.

Latest from the Solar Wiki

All articles →